Distribute: "to disperse through a space or over an area; spread; to pass out or deliver to intended recipients" (dictionary.com).
"Social networking systems... require acknowledgment by the recipient in order to establish a connection" (O'Rielly). We can see that facebook, as a social network, fits into the realm of Web 2.0. It requires user interaction to continue. Without participation, it would cease to function. It is a dynamic and stimulating network that thrives on, and invokes, feedback. "Facebook helps you connect and share with the people in your life" (facebook.com). And the people in their lives, and the people in their lives, and so on. I realize that not everyone is connected to each other in this medium, but I'm counting on the fact that people like to connect with people similar to themselves - homophily - in getting this blog to spread. If it holds true for my sister, it shouldn't be too difficult to start a chain of "shares," "likes," and comments.
"From blogging to social network sites to media sharing sites to sites that provide social streams, we are seeing countless ways in which a motivated individual can make their personal content available. There were always folks willing to share their story but the Internet gave them a pulpit on which to stand" (Boyd). Facebook is ideal in that it is quick and easy to share within that space, and shares have potential to become viral. All that's required are folks who are willing to listen. Distribution has largely become about commanding attention. However, attention spans tend to become short when it comes to facebook. People look for easy and available amusement. In this way I face a slight challenge. Checking out my sister's blog will require people to actually leave the facebook realm and be wiling to content themselves with reading instead of something more passive such as listening/watching/etc. This slight step of involvement may prove to be a hindrance. Yet, I am sure genuinely interested people will be willing to take that step. And no matter how short their attention spans, facebookers are at least reliable in that they tend to continuously come back and be a potential audience.
"From blogging to social network sites to media sharing sites to sites that provide social streams, we are seeing countless ways in which a motivated individual can make their personal content available. There were always folks willing to share their story but the Internet gave them a pulpit on which to stand" (Boyd). Facebook is ideal in that it is quick and easy to share within that space, and shares have potential to become viral. All that's required are folks who are willing to listen. Distribution has largely become about commanding attention. However, attention spans tend to become short when it comes to facebook. People look for easy and available amusement. In this way I face a slight challenge. Checking out my sister's blog will require people to actually leave the facebook realm and be wiling to content themselves with reading instead of something more passive such as listening/watching/etc. This slight step of involvement may prove to be a hindrance. Yet, I am sure genuinely interested people will be willing to take that step. And no matter how short their attention spans, facebookers are at least reliable in that they tend to continuously come back and be a potential audience.
Works Cited
Boyd, Danah. 2009. "Streams of Content, Limited Attention: The Flow of Information through Social Media." Web2.0 Expo. New York, NY: November 17.
Dictionary.com. " Find the Meanings and Definitions of Words at Dictionary.com."Dictionary.com. N.p., n.d. Web. 18 Dec. 2012. <http://dictionary.reference.com>.
Facebook.com. "Welcome to Facebook." 18 Dec. 2012. <http://www.facebook.com>.
O'Reilly, Tim. "What Is Web 2.0 - O'Reilly Media." O'Reilly Media - Technology Books, Tech Conferences, IT Courses, News. N.p., n.d. Web. 18 Dec. 2012. <http://oreilly.com/web2/archive/what-is-web-20.html>.